Dallinor on 23 January 2013
ethomaz said: Somebody in GAF said the same than I said. "No matter how you turn it, you can't get 2.2GB of VRAM..." This VRAM is impossible. |
Does that discredit the leak entirely or could it be something else?
Edit: thanks for expanding on the information above.
What I mean is could it be some other form of memory or is it just completely wrong?