By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Played_Out said:
That is exactly what I thought when I played it.

Admittedly, I only read the first few paragraphs, but I have to say that I agree with every word. It was way too simple compared to other fighting games that were around at the time and it was obviously designed as pure fan-service to milk the pocket money out of naive kids.

"nothing more than a blatant suck on the wallets of the fans of the fluff of the fat-heads"

So very, very true. I applaud his integrity.

Congratulations, you just applauded the integrity of a man who reviewed Smash Brothers, gave it a 2 out of 10, and never played it against another human being.

 

You also just cheered when someone said that Smash brothers was a suck on our wallets, implying it was a cheaply put together game, when in actuality it has always been expensively and obsessively developed and delayed until it was ready.

 

It's funny how you consistantly end up on the opposing side of Nintendo development.

 

Wise up, here's what you should be doing:

 

Applaud the integrity of reviewers who base their reviews on the quality and concept of the game, and not their own personal reviewers tilt score. Applaud reviewers who recognize quality development and attention to detail.

 

I could see you hip-hip hurraying him for giving the game a 6/10, and in all honesty, a 6/10 would have hurt a lot more than a 2/10 would.

 

Anyone who sees this review now, reads the majority of it, and is like "you know, he's right" is a damn fool. The review is a joke, the author certainly regrets its existance, and anyone who hops into a post like this and says: "Wow, he's exactly right," has just missed the point so utterly and completely, that I'm remiss to describe it in words.



I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.

NO NO, NO NO NO.