| Xxain said:
But why would you hold to these standards while playing a 14 year old game that released 2 generations ago? And yes it is shallow. SE has shown to be highly incapable of getting FF's out in timely matter..unless it involves lighting in some way. They have FF14, VS, and X all in limbo. They dont need another FF in pipeline for years especially if its wasting resources solely on a graphical remake. Wild Arms: Alter Code F is still the ultimate example of remake. That wasnt a enhanced port. They remade EVERYTHING from the ground up: Updated graphics, rewrote the whole entire script with added stuff they had to exclude the first time, Battle system redone, Music redone, added 3 new characters, more optional sides and bosses and new post game content. Thats resources used wisely. Thats a remake thats worth it. If they want to do something with FF8 I'd ratherdo FF8-2 |
Wait, you just said that Wild Arms: Alter Code F is a wise remake, including graphics, yet FF8 is not?
I think you're full of it.
Edit: About standards, the basic term used in the industry is graphics that age well, and graphics that don't. Some here said that FFVIII aged better than FFVII, it's just s judgement call on how visually appealing a game remains over time, despite technological upgrades over time. In my tastes, FFI endures the test of time, FFII doesn't, FFIV does, FFV doesn't (my tastes), FFIX does, FFVIII doesn't.
