dallas said:
Google tablets on the other hand, push users into google search, its main cash cow. all they have to do is click on Chrome, and for most users they have google.com as their default page..... and bam! they get going. This isn't even charging google in the least so in terms of profits they should be a net positive, even though the results improved are technically in other parts of google |
Here's the problem: An Android tablet is not a Google tablet.
Pretty much every Android device sold in China, for example, has the Google stripped out and replaced with Baidu and other equilavent services. Every Kindle replaces Google services with Amazon's. Even Microsoft has paid for the right for Bing to displace Google as the default search service on some Android devices.
Google has surrendered all control of their platform in the name of marketshare. The result is a platform which "wins" marketshare, but reaps almost none of the benefits that marketshare dominance is supposed to earn you. With past evidence suggesting that most of Google's mobile profits come from iOS users, there is no indication that profits will follow marketshare.

"The worst part about these reviews is they are [subjective]--and their scores often depend on how drunk you got the media at a Street Fighter event." — Mona Hamilton, Capcom Senior VP of Marketing
*Image indefinitely borrowed from BrainBoxLtd without his consent.







