DirtyP2002 said:
Turkish said:
DirtyP2002 said:
Turkish said:
kowenicki said:
Turkish said:
kowenicki said:
No it will be rightly canned. |
Huh why would they can a service that brings in money?
|
To avoid bad reviews of the new machine. Home is a terrible idea, badly executed.
|
So you're thinking it'll be canned just to avoid bad reviews? It didn't matter on PS3, it brings in money and thats what matters to a business. Home is a great idea and ps4 will be the perfect platform to relaunch it.
|
source that it brings in money?
Because 2nd life was bigger than Home is and it did not. That is why I am asking.
|
"The general message I've heard from Sony employees is "hey, you don't use Home, but it makes money," and as my story from yesterday pointed out, it's not only an easy money maker for the company; there are legions of users deeply passionate about Home."
http://www.giantbomb.com/news/the-man-pulling-playstation-homes-strings/3445/
|
That is 20 months old.
I doubt it saw any kind of growth. I neither hear inet crowd talking about it anymore nor have I ever heard anyone in the real life talking about it.
|
Doesn't matter, I also have sources from 2010 saying it is profitable. And neither was anyone talking about Home last year, or the year before, and people like you kept on saying "who uses Home" for years. It is making money, and you don't need confirmation every month to hear it is profitable, its a system built on microtransactions, they tend to be profitable.
