The fact that all those charts are done in an incorrect manner means I simply skipped over the entire article. Im not going to read something when the person makes misleading graphs on purpose. Of course average review score difference looks like a massive difference when you put it on a graph with a scale of 16 that should actually be 100.
64,70,73 out of 100 isn't a big difference. Especially when the systems don't have the same number of games.







