If you are against gay marriage, explain why without mentioning religion

[Areym]

fordy said:

Areym said:
The only possible argument would be that gay marriage could lead to bestiality. If a person can prove that an animal is consenting in the two doing it and god know what else, can we allow them to be married? We did it for gays, why not bestiality?

Even so, it's two, somewhat different things but I am pro gay marriage and opening the gateway to bestiality would be the only real argument I can think of.

You do realise that a lot of people are going to be offended for you grouping gay marriage in with bestiality, right? Besides, bestiality is the act of a human having sex with an animal. Gay marriage might not even involve sex at all. What you'd use for that argument is to denounce homosexual acts themselves, and I'm afraid you're decades late to that party, my friend.

Like I said, I can't come up with a valid argument against gay marriage, mainly because I support it or at the very least, I am indiferent. 

I should have expanded on bestiality but I got lazy and hafl-assed the post. Long story short, if a man can prove that he loves and animal and that animal loves him back equally (which I admit would be hard as fuck to do if not impossible) and he wants to ger married, can we stop him? By letting gays get married, it would be we no longer consider marriage to be between exclusively a man and woman. Now, you could deny it by saying  that its interspecies love/marriage is wrong, blah blah blah. I really don't see why anybody would be butthurt about gay marriage. I mean, you're not getting married, it doesnt involve you in the least so why oppose it.

At the end of the day, its religion. IT IS ALWAYS RELIGION.