sales2099 said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
sales2099 said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
sales2099 said:
Turkish said:
sales2099 said:
Meh even if it does happen we all know 360 million sellers are at a way higher total number then PS3s.
We dont know XBLA vs PSN total numbers, but its common sense that 360 gamers love XBLA way more then PS3 gamers love PSN.I mean, Minecraft is a year old multiplat port and it broke 5 million in 2012. Journey hasn't even breached 1 million (no PR announcement).
|
No PSN gets a pr announcement for any kind of milestone. There are probably 5 PS1 Classsics alone that breached 1m. Expect a few PS2 Classics to also sell millions, like GTA San Andreas.
|
PS1 and PS2 classics is treated differently. Im talking PSN games made for PS3, like Journey.
|
Why should it? Its a digital game thats not current gen retail, so why shouldn't it be added to PSN just like old Xbox games are counted on XBLA? Really none of them ever mattered. The most accurate sales we have to go off of are retail. XBLA was just added as an excuse to remedy Micorsofts lack luster first party post 2008.
|
Its in the name.....PS1 and PS2 classics. XBLA games that happen to be older gen games are altered for 360, even just getting achievement and HD support makes it a 360 title. I go by XBLA and PS3 catered PSN games.
XBLA was around since 2005 buddy, and I think 2010 was a great year for 360 retail games.
|
No need for double standards just because PS digital files still matter. PSN didnt have to be around since 2005 to have their games not being considered PSN exclusives.
|
I know your persona downplays downloadable games, but their relevance has only increased throughout the years. Being retail centric in this day and age just means your behind the times.
|
I thought people hated digital only?
