CDiablo said:
This is a bit OT but why are gun folks against stamping serial numbers on ammo or having a national database of forensic marks from sold guns(firing pin marks, striations, ect)....other than a potential rise in cost. Again it wont help much against street criminals but it can help with getting a piece of the puzzle in a shooting crime. |
I actually want to get a revolver when I eventually get around to buying my gun. Only holds 6 rounds so a restriction of 10 wouldn't bother me. I also plan on getting a conceal and carry permit and will eventually look into a snub nose type of weapon which I've mostly seen at 10 rounds also. I'm mostly interested in protection which I don't think I will ever get into a fire fight so I'm uninterested in needing to reload quickly or carrying many rounds since the snub nose would be close range.
As for hunting, I hate it. People call it a sport but thats bullshit. Its a hobby along with bowling and golf. I can respect bow and arrow hunters who have a challange to overcome. Also hunters usually try to lure or trick the animal. I think they should just use tracking. Unless these hunters are relying on their hunts to bring them food. If thats the case then I don't mind them using guns or traps.
As for your question I have no clue and haven't heard of that but I can only assume it's because they feel its against the constitution (illegal search and seizure maybe?) or they believe government should have minimal relations with it's citizens