Mr Khan said:
Mazty said:
Mr Khan said:
Mazty said:
Mr Khan said:
mai said:
Could anybody translate "lack of business drive" from business English to regular English?
|
EA's still sad and butthurt that Nintendo didn't pay them to use Origin as the basis for Wii U's online.
|
Companies don't get "butthurt". It's not as if this is the only multiplatform not to be coming to the Wii U.
|
Read some of KungKras' posts. EA has a history of bullying and generally being a bunch of brats.
|
Is this the only multiplatform not to be ported to the Wii U? No, therefore why are people trying to dismiss this as EA having an attitude problem which is rediculous for a company of such a size which has stockholders.
Companies may try to influence other companies decisions, but companies are not a bunch of schoolyard bullies looking to ruin another persons day for the hell of it.
|
Because a lot of Western third parties are as short-sighted as infants, as proven by their delightful financial track records. Companies like Take Two and EA are either malicious, incompetent, or a healthy mixture of both. Certainly not smart or successful businesses.
|
Companies are not malicious. Greedy? Yes. Malicious? Where's the profit in that? Saying a company is malicious is rediculously humanising the issue. As I said above, with the wii u not even being 2% of the market and with it showing very little improvement over the 360 and PS3 (technically) then paying to have a team learn how to dev for the wii u and port the game just isn't going to be profitable.
