sc94597 said:
Player1x3 said:
sc94597 said:
Player1x3 said:
Kasz216 said:
Look at his profile home country... your mistaking his arguement.
His arguement is that nothing bad happened in yugoslavia, everyone in Kosovo are terrorists and they did all the ethnic cleansing, not the serbians.
|
How did you come to that conclusion lol? What does kosovo have to do with gun ban?
|
You'd have to read the whole argument from the beginning there is a line of reasoning that goes : guns protect from tyranny -> but the U.S is a developed first would country, and hence will not have tyranny -> look at Nazi Germany and Yugoslavia, both had tyranny and democide, and were developed -> ....
|
There was no tyranny in Yugoslavia. People loved Tito
|
That doesn't mean there wasn't tyranny. People loved Hitler too. ;) Tyranny just means absolute power in the hands of a state.
|
No, that's dictatorship. In common usage, the word "tyrant" carries connotations of a harsh and cruel ruler who places his or her own interests or the interests of an oligarchy over the best interests of the general population, which the tyrant governs or controls. Hitler fits this description better than Tito. And Yugoslavia was probably more liberal and democratic than most, if not all communist countries.
