GameOver22 said:
Kind of an odd statement given that you cited Descartes previously. Its not that hard to see how Descartes could take his skepticism one step futher and deny all knowledge. "I think therefore I am" is not a fundamental truth. It actually assumes a foundational logical truth....the principle of non-contradiction. All Descartes has to do is question whether the principle of non-contradiction is true, which he did with every other possible piece of knowledge. After questioning this principle, his skepcticism would result in him concluding that knowledge is impossible. |
Not really. Descartes determined that there was always one foundational truth - i think therefore I am. Regardless of skepticism, that always remains true in the face of all arguments. No matter the level of skepticism, that will always hold true.