Runa216 said:
You didn't pwn anyone. I stopped replying becuase it's very clear you need to take Biology 101. You show next to no understanding of evolutionary biology, and trying to argue the finer points of genes and mutations would be like Albert Einstein explaining general relativity to someone who just got an A on their first algebra test and think that they've made math their bitch. While you've done the noble thing and accepted that I'm not that bad of a guy in another thread, conceding that you and I can be on the same side since I really just want to take the religious weapon the fanatics have away from them, your assault and insults on scientific progression is not something I wish to waste my time with. If you don't understand the simplest biological truths, I'm not going to bother arguing with you about it. I will not argue with steadfast and aggressive ignorance masquerading as 'deeper truth', and I certainly won't stand for being treated as a fool becuase I won't lower myself to your level just so you can beat me with experience. I think dsgrue3 would be wise to do the same. I understand prides can hurt when you walk away, dsgrue3, but trust me, happydolphin does not win just becuase you give up an unwinnable fight. Call it a noble retreat. |
You went against me on the very first point, that observation precludes existence yet I was right.
You say many many things but little to counter my argument.
I did the noble thing because I call thing s as they are. Funny how I neither want to walk away because I would feel like I've "lost" the fight, though neither of you actually argued my concern, and that was what point is it where the speciation occurs precisely and since it's a gradual speciation, is there a breaking point upon which incompatibility occurs. If so, how do the individuals mate together and is it sustainable? Then, once we get to the point of it actually being plausible, my question would be to you guys, is it probably. But we're not even there yet. We're just at the point of "happyd, you know nothing". And we stay there.
But once again I'm told I am clueless, I need to take biology, I'm at the level of kids.
Seriously, to maintain _my_ pride, I kind of want to walk away right now. But why does it have to come to this? Why do I constantly have to prove myself to you guys? How is that even fair in any way?
This far, I've destroyed dsgrue's point on existence using Evolution to counter-argue him. He lost that fight. Now, after so much back and forth, we're finally at the point where we are arguing speciation in its detail and I'm told I'm not worth arguing with. Why, because I am too tough a fight? I sure would think so you guys are struggling to answer my questions.
