By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DirtyP2002 said:
bananaking21 said:
DirtyP2002 said:
bananaking21 said:
DirtyP2002 said:
bananaking21 said:

for people pointing out the GT5 was bundled

 

 

enjoy and celebrate the sales, but just dont be hypocrites and downplay GT5 sales because it was bundled after 3 years

1 limited console bundle vs 8 regular bundles then.

ok so explain this to me, GT5 sales are pointless because it was bundled in its 3rd year. while halo 4's bundle doesnt matter because its only 1 bundle at launch?


No that is not what I said.

GT5 sold well, no doubt! Some of its sales are due to heavy bundling. And no, GT5 was not bundled after three years. In fact it is still being bundled after 3 years.


both games sold great no arguing there. Halo's will most probably be better too. and the "heavy bundling" only started with the slim which released in octobor 

Don't believe everything ethomaz tells you.

GT5 was bundled the day it released.

Limited edition for Japan, release date November 3, 2010:
http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/18/ps3-gets-titanium-blue-makeover-for-gran-turismo-5-launch-bundle/

 

 

And then there are still various editions (esstentials / platinum / GT5 academy edition / GT5 XL edition) and quite a few bundles with peripherals, but I don't feel like posting these as well.

I posted this a couple of times now, I don't get why people have a problem to acknowledge that Sony bundled GT5 in a very big way.

i dont know what ethomaz has to do with this thread. and when did i deny that sony didnt bundle GT5? didnt MS also heavily bundle halo reach and 3 before? dont all manufactures bundle their best selling games? if those bundles were the majority of GT5 sales then littlebig planets and uncharted sales would have been the same as GT5's, but they are not. bundling did help its sales but its not the only reason its selling. no reason to put down GT5's sales because of it. thats what im been trying to say all along