| Chrizum said:
Woah, woah this is not fair. Don't lump me in with "evolutionists" or with any poster in this topic. I'm just letting you know your definition of evolution is very off. It really is. Random mutations do play a part in the grand scheme of things but they are just that: random. The evolution of life is a very driven, logical and determined process, it's not random at all. |
It's hard not to lump you in with the others because you use the same slurs "Don't post ridiculous comments" and the good old rhetoric. But okay, not that you told me I'll make an effort to think of you as a separate thought altogether.
As for the driven nature of evolution, that's not what I learned from the theory. What I learned was that, given natural selection, certain random mutations take precedence in persistence over others. How is that driven other than by natural selection, which in and of itself is more of a filter than a logical process. Tell me if I'm wrong, because it seems like with every different person a new perception of evolution is shared with me.
