| dsgrue3 said:
Science does not require faith. Results of experiments are repeatable. You don't seem to understand that. Evolution isn't an "effect of random mutations" it's a spontaneous event. Did you even read the source I provided concerning e. coli? Maybe try reading a source before commenting upon it? Did you read about phylogeny? No, you didn't. You have no idea what you're talking about. I'm giving you sources and you aren't even reading them and then wonder why I come across as condescending. You are so opposed to finding out the truth because it would ultimately prove your belief completely ridiculous. |
I read the E.Coli article and didn't comment on the phylogeny yet so hold your tongue.
In the E.Coli article, the gene needed to consume citrate was dormant. I'm hoping this isn't the case for bacteria to human evolution. Otherwise, how did the dormant gene get there in the first place.
This isn't very complex stuff tbh. Easy question, do you think you're more intelligent than I am?
EDIT: My concerns about in-breeding in mammals and the constraints to intra-species cross-breeding are still not addressed. Odds are they will never be, because evolution is not the answer.
