Viper1 said:
If carbon dating were the only method we used, you'd have a valid point. But have dozens. Some offer more accurate pictures or work on better elements than others but when you combine them together, it's pretty damn hard to refute the results. |
So you think. People also had evidence that protiens carried our genetic material at one point and that atoms were the smallest particle. But we know better now. All I'm saying is you can't say its absolute untill proven and it takes a lot to prove something.
Also, even with the dating it still doesn't disprove religion. Just certain views religions has held at one point (just like science has done to itself so many times before)
And I'm not religious. I love science and truth (biochem major with a minor in philosophy). But I'm not going to be so quick to say "this disproves that or this proves it"
