disolitude said:
I also can't understand why anyone that understands technology and looks back at Windows Vista today would say that was a poor OS. It had some driver issues due to a fundimental change in driver security (due to crazy hacking and viruses on Windows XP) and it had a slightly higher spec requirment than the market was ready for. Anyone that likes Windows 7 has Windows Vista to thank as it did all the groundowork. Finally if you do have Wndows 8 installed and don't like how things are, I will gladly make it work exactly like windows 7 did for you. Just give me admin remote desktop priveladges and 15 minutes... :) |
Windows 7 is everything people were hoping (and MS were saying) that Vista would be. Vista was a resource hog and failed to deliver the gaming performance one wanted, it was even touted as the very first "true gaming Windows". I kept XP all the way up to Windows 7 and it was fine, and I only had 2GB or RAM and an ATi X1950XTX anyway (not capable of DX10 rendering and Vista would have eaten most of my RAM).
As a standalone product, Vista is not horrible. My main point is; it failed to deliver on the somewhat lofty promises and even went directly against some of them (mostly memory consumption) and was a major letdown to a lot of users, me included. Windows 7 perfected the positives of Vista and is overall a smoother, more stable and less memory hungry experience.
I get the feeling that Win 8 was produced solely to hit the handheld/tablet/phone markets as a response to Google and Apple, the fact that it arrived so quickly only serves to further my suspicion. And that's fine for what it is, I just don't want tablet interfaces and functionality to set the norm for desktop computers and performance, its a poor match in my honest opinion (everyone in here knows that I'm not a fan of tablets and smartphones, or handheld consoles for that matter) and I don't like the direction the whole thing is taking.







