CGI-Quality said:
Player1x3 said:
CGI-Quality said:
Player1x3 said:
CGI-Quality said:
Where's the fun in using the machine that can't be topped? 
That and I don't remember the last time an expansion pack (or DL-only title) ever won a "Best Graphics" award - on any platform. What was surprising, however, was MGS4 beating out Gears of War 2 in 2008, on most sites. I thought Gears 2, overall, looked better, despite MGS4's better looking character models.
|
Maybe that's because PC isn't a single universal built in hardware but a term for any general-purpose computer? Not really a fair comparison
|
That had little to do with my point. Why wasn't it a fair comparison when MGS4 was compared to Crysis?
|
I was addressing the ''machine that can't be topped'' part
|
I left a smilie there for a reason. Wasn't meant to be taken seriously. And still, that doesn't answer my question - why didn't you address the poster who compared MGS4 with Crysis if you thought the comparison wasn't "fair"?
|
I didn't think that that wasn't fair. Machine that can't be topped- that's what i thought wasn't fair