Indeed. Gun control does not and should never mean banning guns. Such a thing is idealistic fantasy and unconstitutional. There is nothing wrong with a pistol with a ten bullet clip for self defense. There is nothing wrong with hunting with a rifle. No matter what we do, acts of violence will still occur. We just need to look into ways to REDUCE the violence. Forcing someone to reload every ten bullets instead of every 30 would be a nice start, and would have actually saved lives at Tuscon where the gunman was taken down while he was reloading. No gun control is fool proof, every law will have its holes and flaws. But one need only look at a country like Australia to see that it can have real, long term benefits.
|
Aielyn said: |
According to an article I posted, Australia's fire arm homicide rate hit .1 % in 2009, 33 times lower then America's.
As for countries like Israel and Finland, there is one critical difference between us and them: every military age male is conscripted into the military in these countries. With that comes a psych evaluation and lots of fire arm training and everything else that comes with military service. Its essentially gun control in its own right, just a different kind. If you want to use those countries as an example, fine. I just hope you also support universal conscription ;). Lord knows it would probably help us get into fewer wars. These countries also more socialist and leftist then the United States with things like government funded universal healthcare, which I'm sure helps with their standard of living and thus reduces violent crimes. So by all means, lets be more like Israel and Finland ;).








