Ail said:
Kasz216 said:
Mr Khan said:
sc94597 said:
LinkVPit said:
I think we're ok, we're not ruled by gun-toters in congress! Enjoy being gunned down for no reason.
All I've learned is don't argue guns with Americans.
|
That's silly, why would somebody who has a gun and lives in a low homicide area be gunned down? It's the people without guns who become the victims of gun crime. All I know is that my federal government wants to take away my right to due process of law (NDAA), free speech (Patriot's Act), property rights, etc. And if it weren't for my constitution and just as importantly, my right to bear arms, they would have by now. Gun prohibition would be the destruction of my way of life (American) and it is quite apparant.
|
Your right to bear arms has dick all to do with what the federal government will or won't do to you.
Get this through your heads now, gun nuts. No military is scared of you.
|
I disagree. I think gun owning americans could defeat quite a number of armies in the world. There are a lot of shitty ill equipped armies.
Outside which, one needs only to look at Iraq to see just how annoying armed militants can be... imagine if every Iraqi insurgent had his own gun.
It's be a serious pain in the ass. That said I doubt it's holding any country at bay, since the US army could pretty much beat any other 3-4 nations armies combined... but your ignoring reality if you think it would have zero effect in a invaded situation.
I mean picture Iraq, with better armed insurgents, a worse invading army, and FAR more cover, places to hide infrastructure, over a larger area.
|
I think you are kidding yourselves if you think there is a realistic scenario of any country invading the US and staying there the long term.
And if you really think the second amendment is what prevents this , you're crazy enough that you probably shouldn't own a gun anyway...
|
And the award for "Not being able to read an entire post" goes to....
