LinkVPit said:
The fact that you need a gun to stay safe must be a trigger to say something isn't right? And yes people are responsible for the actions, but would that tragedy have happened or been less if he had a knife or other weapon? Chances are no or less deaths at least. We have gun laws in the UK and last time I checked we haven't had a gun massacre. How many have the US had? |
you dont need one to stay safe, but it helps.
i'd rather have my Glock than a knife, or my fists, if some criminal comes at me. regardless if they are armed with a gun.
as for your second question, undoubtedly, yes. the largest loss of life, in a school attack in the US, involved ZERO guns, yet ~130 people died. the single largest deadliest attack on US soil, involved no firearms, and yet 3000 people died.
it really isnt hard to fatham that this evil animal, couldnt have killed an equal amount of 5 year olds, with nothing more than a knife. really what kind of fight could they put up.
there's a reason that in the last 50 years in the US, all but 1 killing spree of 3 or more people dying, have happened in "gun free zones"
