flukus said:
PDF said:
Avinash_Tyagi said:
PDF said:
@avinash but you cannot prove it doesnt exist. Also I said the arguement is that your killing somthing that could of lived. If you dint interfere then it would of became a baby.
We are so close at settling this. Your opinion is = to anyone opinon that is faith based. Your opinion is based on how you grew up and raised and experiences just like their was, they just had some religion incorporated in their life.
When a opinion is proven it becomes fact like gravity. That is not a opinion it is fact. When somthing is proven as a fact and can not be refuted it is correct.
|
Except that its not alive, so you aren't killing it, since it can't survive independently at that point. See the problem is you're trying to use faith to override what we know in science and what is legal under the constitution, and that is where the problem arises. |
It was going to be alive is the point. If you plant a seed in the ground and let it grow for a couple of days then you dig it up. It was never really a tree but you killed it all the same because you took its chance from being a tree away. The problem is your trying to overide any person with faith who are just important as you under constitution because they recieve one vote just like you. So no matter what you think their opinion is equal under the Law and you fail to see that. Also I do not think it is the right for a the Supreme Court to make law. They shall only interpret not make. So Roe v. Wade should have never been made. Only congress has the right to make laws as it is stated in our constitution. |
But people that are pro choice arn't overriding people of faith, everyone agrees their allowed to carry their child full term, it's anti abortionists that are trying to override people who don't share their faith by saying they can't have an abortion. And your logic goes right back to the "every sperm is sacred song". Every sperm could have been a child, so I'm killing a million kids before going to bed every night. |
we should get off the topic of the Supreme court not being able to do this or that. Roe v Wade is in fact a decision made by "activists" judges, as really, there is no place in the constitution that says this.
But Brown V Topeka BoE is a similar ideal, technically not actually supported by the constitution (really read the 14th amendment to see why) and was very much hated by the people of that time. Yet i dont think you can find to many people this day that will say it was wrong (besides the KKK)
Anywayz, the Supreme court has nothing to do with this discussion really, as you put religion in politics, and the Supreme Court is not a political entity of the government.
