| dsgrue3 said:
Perhaps you missed it, but his point was to find an atheist source to prove his point. Logic has nothing to do with atheism. He might as well have sought research on apples from a corn farmer. That's why I said the source is suspect. I would never allow wikipedia unless both parties agreed that the material is sound. Source: http://logic.stanford.edu/classes/cs204/lectures/lecture04.pdf And I've already stated that it's not pertinent to the OP or to his notion that he didn't use strongman. Multiple premises? Fine, allow it. 1) All animals, except humans, exhibit homosexuality. 2) Humans are animals. 1 & 2 are the premises. His (flawed) logic concluded Humans exhibit homosexuality. Then 'happy' said No, it is completely based off of an uncertified and undescribed premise, which is that all species are alike. For some reason he either 1) Claimed that the premises were uncertified. 2) Manifested an additional premise - "all species are alike" Understand the problem here? Edit: I now realize his intention was to simply show flawed logic, but he unintentionally used strawman in order to do so, when he could have simply done as I did. |
@bold.
You are lying about the topic at hand, because you initially said that there was only 1 premise in a logical construction and now you are changing your tune.
Just be a man and admit it.
| dsgrue3 said:
Can't recall your previous statement? Here, I'll show you: As for nonsense here, no it is not. I said his logic was based off a missing and (in my view) faulty premise. The premise wasn't missing anything. You don't seem to understand logic at all. Premise Substsantiating claims Deductions Conclusion You don't make multiple premises. As to the off topic item, I proved that you were incorrect as per my definition of existence. Clearly, you have selective memory. |
I put it in bold-underline-italics.
Now can you admit it, and change your tone? You are completely out of whack.
