dsgrue3 said:
Utter nonsense. You said his premise was faulty, he didn't have more than one. You won what? Odd comment. |
When did I say I won? Reading problems today?
I said that I was correct in beating a dead horse with you in the "Why I hate debating religion" thread, nothing odd here. You and others were saying it was useless, and you were wrong.
As for nonsense here, no it is not. I said his logic was based off a missing and (in my view) faulty premise. He had his, and he was missing another.
Horse = almost beat.







