By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
dsgrue3 said:
happydolphin said:

We beat a dead horse last time and I was right. We can try beating it again.

I said "a premise", not "the premise".

Utter nonsense. You said his premise was faulty, he didn't have more than one. You won what? Odd comment.

When did I say I won? Reading problems today?

I said that I was correct in beating a dead horse with you in the "Why I hate debating religion" thread, nothing odd here. You and others were saying it was useless, and you were wrong.

As for nonsense here, no it is not. I said his logic was based off a missing and (in my view) faulty premise. He had his, and he was missing another.

Horse = almost beat.