| dsgrue3 said:
I guess you're just extremely bad at explaining what was a simple logical fallacy. His premise was fine, his conclusion wasn't. |
I said he was missing a presmise (which I believed was false), I never said his premise was wrong.
You need to reread the thread. I may be bad at explaining, but it's not the first time you misunderstand me so you could also be bad at understanding. Just saying, could be right, could be wrong.
EDIT: Fair enough, I did say it was based off a false premise. What I meant by that was that he was missing a premise, and that it made his premise (the sum total of it) incomplete and ultimately false in my view.
Scratch that, it was based off a false premise (now I'm getting alzheimers), which was that "all species share the same behaviors", without which the conclusion breaks down.
Bottom line is that his logic was incorrect, and you initially said the contrary.
