happydolphin on 20 December 2012
| theprof00 said: to reiterate in a logical way for you, the bolded you pointed out is logical unto itself; b follows from a. However, a is an assumption (logical term, look it up) and a is unproven, therefore because god is unproven (logically), b is not proven by a, but may be proved by something else hypothetically. |
I am not discussing the logical validity of the claim, I'm criticising the use of the rules "Appeal to authority". You are once again using special pleading.
Appeal to authority:
"Using the opinion or position of an authority figure, or institution of authority, in place of an actual argument."
This has nothing to do with:
"if god wants us to procreate, why would he make gays."
I'm beginning to believe special pleading is something you are very good at.
