By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
runqvist said:
Nirvana_Nut85 said:

I think we all can agree with that. Anyone who has actually spent more then 10 minutes with the system knows that it is money well worth invested and that the review given is completely moot.

 Also, I really would not be suprised if he was actually one of the reviewers (It's a conspiracy,lmao!)


False. I have fiddled with Wii U for at least 15 minutes and I disagree with you.

Well now, if I am mistaken and in fact you did actually sit down and take the time to play games and navigate the system, then I highly doubt you would completely agree with the "as I stated before" the piss poor, ridiculous attempt at a review that was given.

I don't know where, or whose system you used but the game pad is anything but unresponsive. You claim you own a tablet but unless you have some sort of "futuristic" one we all don't know about, there is not much of a difference (I'm an IPad owner).

The launch games and new I.P's on the Wii U (while I admit do not push graphics at this point) are miles ahead of "any" 360 launch game and the fact that they even claimed that was ridiculous and is not an opinion but complete and utter flamebate.

The rest has already been refuted (although you still seem to disagree) and I basically just wanted to point out the two that annoyed me the most.

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and with freedom of speech they are allowed to make belligerant, incorrect statements regardless of how other people feel. With that stated, if you are being paid to give an accurate and  non biased review on a system, especially if you belong to a network where some people actually take those reviews seriously, then a modicum of professionalism should be shown, unlike what those two gentleman displayed.



" Rebellion Against Tyrants Is Obedience To God"