| Mendicate Bias said: I still think if the Pats had scored earlier they would have won, 49ers aren't built to come back from behind. But when you turn the ball over 5 times in the first half then its not suprising to go down 31-3 at the half. The fact that they came back and scored 4 touchdowns in a row says a lot about this team I think. Hopefully we don't have any more games with turnover after turnover again. Knowing Belichick we won't. |
The Pats had 4 turnovers, 2 in each half. The score was 17-3 at halftime.
The 49ers also had missteps as well. INT in the end zone, fumble at the 5 yard line, mishandled snap on 4th and 1 (pretty much a turnover)... Not to mention the other fumbled snaps...
The defense started playing more conservatively during the pats run, using a lot of zone defense. Their man defense worked much better as it stifled them in the first half and they didn't get back into it until the end.
49ers did well running the ball though. 180yds total, even more than their 162yd/gm avg.

starcraft: "I and every PS3 fanboy alive are waiting for Versus more than FFXIII.
Me since the games were revealed, the fanboys since E3." 


Skeeuk: "playstation 3 is the ultimate in gaming acceleration" 









