Great thread. People need to understand 2 things:
a)If you debate the PS2 vs DS numbers is not because "you are paranoid or afraid" is because the numbers are off. If the numbers were clear we would all accept it.
b) People that are bothered by the fact that the few who are discrediting VGChartz are the very same ones who use this sites numbers on a daily bases for their arguments. nee d to understand: some estimates are better than other estimates. If there is evidence... what's the problem with debating the numbers???
If VGC numbers are wrong we should accept it, just because we used other (more reliable) numbers??? Come on!!! That's a dumb!!!!







