By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kresnik said:
Oh and just one other thing - I realise I've done it too, but there's a huge discrepancy between some of the studio sizes we've listed which makes it a bit unfair to compare.

For example, Square-Enix and Rockstar are both 10 different studios under one name (unless you listed them separately, such as "Rockstar North").

Comparatively, teams like Naughty Dog were just one studio until very recently, and Retro still is just one team I believe. It's harder for them to put out as varied and large a library as some of the other studios.


Square Enix has like a gazillion different studios. Especially if you include A lot of old Eidos Defunct studios like Ion Storm. 

Nintendo isn't exactly one studio either as there's more than one EAD. If Eidos is going to be considered Square-Enix, then Retro should be considered with nintendo. Rare is debatable because Nintendo only owned 49% share when they were together.