| osed125 said: You said: "Sony's troubles were not unexpected, but I think I might hop onboard at some point. " Then you said: "Logically if you think that they have hit the rock bottom, you should at least consider to invest since the only way is up. :) " So you might hop on board because the only way for Sony's stock is up. Then: "Nintendo has not hit the rock bottom yet, of course." You said "yet", that means you clearly think Nintendo can only go rock bottom, thus why you won't invest. What's strange is that Nintendo is in a waaaayyy better position than Sony, so by your logic you should also invest in Nintendo. |
Wth is this shit?
Wrap your mind around this.
I said that they haven't hit the rock bottom yet, which means that they will go down. I did not in any way say that they are not going to come up from that, which is what you claim that I have said. They will hit the rock bottom and then go up, got it? When they hit the rock bottom in my opinion, it is a time when I will consider ntdoy as an option. Just like Sony.
If I think that a company stock will be going down, I won't be investing on it. How does that sound?
You don't understand logic, so why even bother to argue about it.
