| Soundwave said:
The problem with your logic is you're operating in a fantasy land where Nintendo has the same credibility with the audience games like Assassin's Creed and Call of Duty and what not attract. That is Microsoft-Sony-country and Nintendo's basically let them have that audience all to themselves for the last 6-7 years. You may say "well that's not fair! what about Sony and MS". Sony and MS don't need to prove anything to that audience, they own that audience and get the benefit of the doubt. That's not fair, but guess what. Life isn't fair. |
This has nothing to do with call of duty. I am living in the real world. The problem with call of duty is it cannot carry you along forever. Eventually people will bore of it. This is why nintendo is being smart in broadening their horizons. For the multiplats people will buy them if they want them on nintendo. That was the point I was making. They don't care who has the 'best version'. I have a feeling most people still wouldn't have bought call of duty if it was the best version. It isn't aimed at ps3 and 360 owners. It is aimed at the nintendo fans that want it.
You are putting too much emphasis on horse power. Consumers are not drawn to a console because it has the best looking games. Tell me now if nintendo released a console as powerful as you want would epic or bethesda be here?
One more thing to complete my year = senran kagura localization =D
