PDF said:
You have not answered any of my questions directly but instead avoid them. I will answer your question directly. I want you to understand that you cant say somone opinion is no good because it has faith behind it. As i will say your is just as good without faith. UNDERSTAND? I want people to dissagree with the substance of a law not if it has faith or no faith. If you dont agree with my beliefs it is fine, Your opinion is just as valid as mine. I am not dictating my beliefs on you any more than any congress man is trying to dictate his beliefs on you. Everyone has beliefs even people of no faith. It plays into their judgment and decisions. You should just see all people beliefs = and dissagree with the substance of it not the fact that it may be a bit faith driven. |
What questions have you asked that I haven't answered?
Ok, then disagree with this, abortion is a right of privacy according to the court, The fetus before the third trimester is not viable, adnd therefore not a living being so that's the reason why it should remain legal, at least prior to the third trimester, now go ahead and tell me why it shouldn't, without using faith/religion
Predictions:Sales of Wii Fit will surpass the combined sales of the Grand Theft Auto franchiseLifetime sales of Wii will surpass the combined sales of the entire Playstation family of consoles by 12/31/2015 Wii hardware sales will surpass the total hardware sales of the PS2 by 12/31/2010 Wii will have 50% marketshare or more by the end of 2008 (I was wrong!! It was a little over 48% only)Wii will surpass 45 Million in lifetime sales by the end of 2008 (I was wrong!! Nintendo Financials showed it fell slightly short of 45 million shipped by end of 2008)Wii will surpass 80 Million in lifetime sales by the end of 2009 (I was wrong!! Wii didn't even get to 70 Million)