Of course I think I'm right. I stand by my opinion that Capcom is, in fact, the superior developer. Also, I'm well aware of the fact my opinion is in the minority of this site. I also acknowledge that it is not wrong to think that Nintendo is better than Capcom, as Nintendo is a fantastic developer. With that said, I don't know where you're getting this "I'm right and thats all there is too it!" thing from. I wasn't at all forceful with my post.
Both Devil May Cry and Zelda can be considered games of the same genre, and that's why I chose those two games. You can not deny the fact that Devil May Cry is a great franshice. It's one of the best games of it's genre. An 83% score is a score you give to a solid game, not a top-tier game of that genre. Devil May Cry 4's gameplay has endless depth that can only be matched by Ninja Gaiden, a game that ranks in at 94.1%. The game has a solid story, great gameplay, amazing visuals, and runs at 60 FPS; but it's only an 83% game? Something is not right. There's no doubt in my mind that the game has been underscored for rather fallacious reasons. If you think I'm in denial of something, go right ahead and call me out on it. As I've already in my previous paragraph -- the one right above this one -- I understand that my opinion is in the minority. A large majority of this site shows unprecedented favoritism towards Nintendo, so I'm not expecting people to agree with my stance. However, it's always fun to debate with other gamers that are passionate about their favorite developers.
I am Washu-bot B, loyal servant of Final-Fan, the greatest scientific genius in the universe!