ethomaz on 04 December 2012
|
Ji99saw said: 1. That's the most ridiculous claim ever if that's the case reach paid for halo 4 dev cost, halo 3 paid for for ODST, and so on 2. You still don't know the dev cost of halo 4 but then again using your logic it had no cost 3. I'm done talking to you, your arguments are weak at best and deluded at worst. Stop quoting me so I don't have to see that icon and come back here |
Not even close = way more than $60 million.
http://www.vg247.com/2012/10/26/halo-4-nothings-even-close-to-sequels-development-cost/
The unique point my arguments are weak is the fact I'm comparing 1 game vs 3 games.
I don't want to spent my time to show the thuth here... GT is still a bigger franchise than Halo... the numbers show that.
