kitler53 said:
Soleron said:
kitler53 said:
eh, a new zelda seems to conflict with the rest imo.
honestly, if nintendo wants profitability to be their main focus (and i suppose that is the goal of every company) they should kill off zelda, metroid, f-zero, pikimin, starfox, smash brothers, 3D mario, and fire emblem (all of their "core" focused franchise). that would give them more resources to get more games out for the audiences that MSony fail miserably at: kids, girls and women, casuals and beginners.
more mario 2D platformers, brain age, nintendogs, mario party, mario kart, wii fits, and other such titles/franchises they could create like that "wii relax" game that never came.
|
"New Legend of Zelda" as in a small, low budget 2D Zelda like NSMB.
Agreed with the rest, Wii Relax/Vitality Sensor was a great idea. I hope they didn't kill it due to E3 reception.
|
question. if nintendo did actually go through with anything even remotely like what i stated. would you still want a nintendo console? i mean, i can see how they would be profitable. but is that really what you want? more wii music, wii play, wii party, brain age, nintendogs and no metroid, star fox, f-zero? for me personally, if just retro was sold off to be 3rd party or (even better for me) to sony i just can't imagine me caring about anything nintendo does anymore.
|
You're right, I wouldn't like it. This thread is about business success not personal likes though.
Even though NIntendo is supposedly catering to me with the 3DS and Wii U (Paper Mario, Smash Bros focus on big epic 3D titles, nostalgia in Nintendo Land and recent Mario), I've hated all of that too.
