oniyide said:
Alby_da_Wolf said:
DaRev said:
biggamejames79 said: Are people really still arguing/concerned with cpu speed/power??? Remember Skyrim on the "most powerful system of the 7th gen"? That was a RAM issue I heard. And what about ps3 having graphics way ahead of the 360? Oh dang, $599.00 and the cell doesn't mean a better GPU, bummer. I buy Nintendo so I can play Nintendo games, not so I can pretend cpu power = high performance games. |
Yep, people (I guess especially PS3 fanboys) seems to happily forget the Skyrim PS3 fiasco! I guess the move from calling Bethesda a crap to developer to calling Wii U a crap syatem. lol
It'll be interesting to see how many of these gokers that couldn't afford a Vita would be able to go out and buy a PS4 at launch. It seems they have not leaned from the whole 3DS vs Vita debate. But time will tell.
Happy gaming and discussion all.
|
LOL, a fiasco that sold more than 4M.
|
it was a silly comparison anyway, comparing, ONE game out of PS3's library to a few on Wii U...oh boy.
|
I can't be bothered to mention the others. But just for argument sake, just look up how Gears of War went from a potential Sony PS3 game to and Xbox 360 exclusive. It should tell you a bit about the power (or lack thereof) of the PS3.
Nintendo Network ID: DaRevren
I love My Wii U, and the potential it brings to gaming.