Isn't this more of "Gaming Discussion" and not "Nintendo discussion"?
I stopped reading the article after this one point . . .
I was wrong because I thought game developers would look at the bigger picture concerning the relationship of their jobs to society.
It's like he expected game developers to all choose to develop to Nintendo because they intrinsically understood that this would be better for "society".
I love video games but I understand very much that gaming is not at all essential to society. Strangest argument if I ever heard one. - -