thismeintiel on 28 November 2012
| Dodece said: @thismeintiel Your point being that consoles break down over time. Holy shit I thought they lasted forever. I could go on with some more biting snide remarks of my own, but I will just skip to the point. We don't know how many miles he put on his console, or whether he practiced good preventive maintenance. Some consoles live a hard life. Some dying sooner then others proves nothing. Before someone tries to offer up a rebuttal. I know some PS3 owners who have run their consoles ten feet under in less then a year. It wasn't the consoles fault. They ran the machines almost constantly in unfit living conditions. That were closer to filthy saunas then places fit for human habitation. So don't even go there. Didn't we have a video on these forums a few weeks ago where a guy had to empty a mountain of dead roaches out of a Wii. @OP Thank you for putting up the link. |
I guess, just like the author, you can ignore the fact he can't even play his 360, as well as all the HW problems it faced for the first few years. Personally, I'd rather have a system that may have a few SLIGHTLY inferior third party games, and therefore are disappointed by it, as opposed to a system that's a nice paperweight. Kinda strange how you are treating this article like a great work, while even some 360 supporters labeled it biased drivel. I'm starting to think that maybe you wrote it. 
