PS3: It Only does Disappointment

[enditall727]

Dallinor said:

Kresnik said:
I like the part where he inadvertently pointed out that his 360 died after 2 and a half years of ownership and begun 'failing' after 2.

That said, if the majority of the games you play are multi-plats and you aren't enticed enough by PS3 exclusives, then yes, there's no real reason to own a PS3 over 360. While I've never had any problems with any PS3 multi-plat game (and I've never compared them side-by-side with a 360 game because why would I buy the same game twice) if you're bothered about performance of these titles then 360 is the better choice.

Didn't buy the trophy argument, though.

I've basically just been playing multiplatforms all year. There's still the difference of paying to play online. That trade off is worth whatever miniscule differences exist between the multiplatforms in my opinion. I agree though, if you do notice a difference, 360 is the best choice. Do people even notice the differences though? I've played COD:BO2 extensively on both PS3/360 and the biggest difference for me is using a different controller.

people did earlier this generation

 

i remember i was BEATING THE BRAKES off of somebodies ass in Fight Night Round 3 on ps3 in like 2007 and 1 of my friends(who is in NO WAY SHAPE OR FORM a fanboy) said "woah! this looks better on the 360, man"

 

but now the games seem to look the same for the most part except for the bayonettas here and there