By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Jaywood2010 on 20 November 2012
Edit Thread
JWeinCom said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Slimebeast said:

Dante's Inferno 75% Meta - "shameless God of War rip-off got what it deserved"

(Sony fans' comments here: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=96873 )

All-Stars Battle Royale 76% Meta - "WTF, unfair reviews of a great game!"


Dantes inferno did not pushing anything that god of war did, It was just a reskinned game. Allstars was setup to be simple, but can be taken seriously as a tournament style brawler. It took what SSMB did to the next level, the presenation just sucked, thats all. I am in it for the core mechanics and the characters and dlc, not any

I love people trying to say this game is deeper and more nuanced than a franchise that's been being dissected by incredibly gamers for upwards of a decade.  Gives me a nice hearty chuckle.  Maybe PSAllStars will be a more tourney capable fighter than Smash (I don't think it will be) but if it is it will take a dedicated community years to help it reach that level.

Reviews seem fair.  Based on the engine alone, I'd give it an 8ish score if you were to view the game in a vacuum.  Judging by reviewers comments, the presentation and extras are meh which should bring it down a bit. 


I feel the same way.  They have said other things about it like it just being an average fighter and that other fighters were better.  I predicted 75-82 roughly around a 78 more than likely  after playing the beta and I have been pretty spot on.  People got pretty upset with me saying that but I guess I was right in the end.  Now if this game was in the low 70's I'd say it was harsh but from what I've played I don't find it harsh.