By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
JazzB1987 said:
michael_stutzer said:
JazzB1987 said:

I dont see the need for this console I have a 3ds as my portable device and also have a DS and bought a PSP last year. The Vita is a PS3 with shitty battery life it does not have alot of good exclusives (Gravity Rush is the only game that makes me want the thing at least to some extend) and the games that are made for consoles like portable black ops/ resistance are shit on the Vita.

It fails at being a portable system and it fails at  bringing the "stationary console" feeling to the portable world.

I dont get why this device exists.

How exactly do you rate 3DS battery life then? Non-existant? It is quite a bit better battery-wise.

If you play games that are equivalent of 3DS games (graphically) it lasts much more.

How exactly do you rate the 15h DS battery life then?  (has as much to do with the Vita as your comment)

Good that you go and defend the Vita so blindly.    The Vita somewhat tries to be a PS3  and therefore it is a PS3 with shitty battery life.   The 3ds doesnt try to be something else like the Vita does. So saying the 3DS is a Wii or whatever with shitty battery life makes no sense here right? Especially when the threads topic is the vita.
Thanks.



There were tests done upon the system's release that proved Vita's battery life was actually better than 3DS's, even with it's higher screen output and in general more raw power. In order to get the Vita to even be comparable you have to cut off the 3D....which is the main gimmick of the entire system. My Vita can last me days depending on what I am playing.

The Vita tries to be Versatile, not a PS3. It was built to be this perfect bridge between handheld gaming standards and home console functionality.



      

      

      

Greatness Awaits

PSN:Forevercloud (looking for Soul Sacrifice Partners!!!)