cookingyourmama said:
kowenicki said:
cookingyourmama said:
kowenicki said:
cookingyourmama said:
Ah yes, it's good to see the usual suspects in here trying to rewrite history whilst trying to make their own flawed opinions seem like fact.... it's almost as if 'other things' aren't going their way.... hmmmmm.
|
Re-writing history? no. Showing ACTUAL history. What are these things that are going a certain way? I do pity people that haven't the balls to say what they think, must really hinder them in their real lives.
|
Hahaha oh dear and look at the 'usual suspects' that have replied to me, proves my point yet again. I've already said EXACTLY what i think about you as well as certain others on this forum in the past and here is yet another thread where you and certain others are either desperate to spin, cherry pick, mock or highlight all things negative about a certain company, very sad.
|
Yeah, youd never do that would you?
I'm convinced you are an alt.
Where is the spin here?
and "Highlighting negative about a company"? or is it actually about some of its fans? There is nothing negative here about Sony, quite the opposite.
|
Nope i just tell it like it is. Where as you and certain other 'fans' are always desperate to paint Sony (and their 'supporters') in a bad light on this forum and now because the PS3 is even closer to overtaking the 360 and the inevitable is in the not too distant future, you and others are now going into damage control mode by trying to play down the PS3's success by bringing up (in recent threads) such insightful put downs as financial reports, generation on generation market shares, the number of years it took, how some fans thought the PS3 would over take the 360 more easily or if the PS3 'only' overtakes the 360 after the new generation has started then some how 'that doesn't count' *rollseyes*. It's all very sad.
|