Mr Khan said:
VGKing said:
z101 said:
Turkish said:
Damn, updating now. Thanks for notifying.
|
Because someone on the internet said it, it must be true ...
Surely you people should wait when real technical specs roll in, not just a lonely number.
And the headline is false at all, because the eDRAM is also RAM and much more and faster than on any console before.
|
Then we would be waiting forever. There's a reason Nintendo hasn't(and won't) reveal specs. The system is way too underpowered to be a next-gen system. This just wont' get good 3rd party support. The ports it already had are horrible.
|
Be very careful making statements like this.
Very, very careful.
|
It's not a statement, its an opinion. For a next-gen console, the Wii U isn't impressive at all to me.(power wise)
What it really comes down to is Nintendo first party games and if you find that Gamepad appealing enough....
I agree with Kotaku's review of the Wii U. They said it's not worth buying yet if you have a PS3 or 360 already.(Which I do)
Of course stuff like Wii U getting accidentaly hacked on Day 1, huge Day 0 firmware update or the slow OS isn't helping to change my opinion.
