JayWood2010 said:
SvennoJ said:
JayWood2010 said:
SvennoJ said:
^^^ A $15 2 hour game (which I played for 20+ hours and still come back to) does not deserve on the list, but a $60 6 hour game, Dishonered, does? (which took me 12 hours)
Length doesn't mean a thing, Halo 4's campaign isn't very long either, the multiplayer experience makes the game just as it does for Journey.
I'm glad that something that isn't a sequel gets the recognition that it deserves.
AC3 it's the 5th game really, Halo 4 -> 7th game? |
If you are going to talk about what I said then reply to me next time. You are 1 person. The majority of people wont play Journey more than even 4 hours. Halo has a ton more content than just storyline and you know this so don't even bring up one aspect of a game. Journey is good but to be on the game of the year list excluding games like Halo 4, Borderlands 2, and multiple others that has much more content, playability, and amazing games in there own way is a slap to the face. If Journey was a $60 game nobody would have even talked about it. Why? because it isnt worth $60
|
Originality and quality of the experience trumps content in my book. I don't know what you mean by much more playability. I paid $45 in the end for Journey, download version and boxed version, I've paid $60 for games I have spend less time with.
Journey moved me as it did many others, Halo 4 was fun with great production values but in the end more of the same.
|
I never said it wasn't a quality game nor did I say it wasnt original. But a 2 hour long $15 dollar game should not be on this list because if it was $60 it wouldnt have gotten half the praise it did. Stop talking about your own personal experience as that is not the majority. I played 25 hours of halo 4 in the first week. Does that mean everybody did? No.
|
I can see why people want it to be GOTY and regardless of how long it is it is still a game. People have been calling GOTY all year for this underrated downloadable game. Let it have its nomination.
