blackstarr said: I wish more gaming sites were like Famitsu with the 4 reviewer set up. It really decreases individual reviewer bias towards the final score. |
I would prefer eliminating the 10 point scale and moving towards a more meaningful scale (and potentially a rubric) ...
In my opinion people really want to know whether you thought the game was 'poor', 'average', 'good', or 'great' (potentially with modifiers above/below for average, very for good/poor, etc) and also want to know how good the game's single player, local multiplayer, online multiplayer, graphics, story, etc where.
A review that looked like:
Single Player: Good
Local Multiplayer: Great
Online Multiplayer: Below Average
Graphics: Below Average
Story: Average
...
Overall: Very Good
Is far more meaingful than "72%"