By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
kowenicki said:
Turkish said:
kowenicki said:
Turkish said:
kowenicki said:
Turkish said:
kowenicki said:
Turkish said:
1. The initial price tag is a tad too high. $300 is great by new-console standards — remember the PlayStation 3 at six big ones? — but general consumers don’t see “Wii” and think “high-end electronics.”

Agree with this one, and this might be the reason it could fail. Remember how 3DS was doing at 250? We might see panic pricecut next year if sales don't pick up.


Yeah because high end electronics in gaming devices ensures success? 

$300 isnt too high... not even close.

Yeah sometimes it ensures success, but thats not the point. The name has Wii in it, its not synonym for expensiveness. Many casuals are probably expecting a cheaper pricetag since they bought the og Wii a lot cheaper. This is Nintendo's most expensive console.

It has never ensured success in gaming.  Especially recently... http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=141085&page=1#

....and once again... $300 isnt expensive.  Why are you saying it is?

It is Nintendo most expensive console because it is their latest console.  WTF are you talking about?    Ever heard of inflation?  There is virtually nothing in it.

 

Stick to your reviews, they make more sense.

PS2 launch price was €499, it went on to sell the most consoles ever. And don't bring up NA launch price because it will only validate what I'm saying. $249 launch price for PS2 made it succesful while its $599 successor struggled, in Europe PS3 did amazing despite its pricetag, that is because the PS2 launch price was also very high. If Nintendo struggles with WiiU sales and encounters a 3DS situation, that will only prove the userbase was expecting a cheaper console.

Very mature of you to resort to the review argument again.


That post is just a rambling mess... you seem to contradict and then agree with yourself in the same post.

Stick to your reviews... they make more sense.

You can't say anything anymore. Because despite knowing ps2s high launch price and its success, you still cling to a flawed logic as "high end gaming devices don't ensure success".

 

Stick


What?   Did you just say that the PS2 was the highest priced and had strongest tech of last gen? 

Stick to your reviews, they make more sense.


PS2 wasn't the strongest console when it launched? Xbox was available in 2000? Use common sense.