By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
mantlepiecek on 15 November 2012
Edit Thread
Mr Khan said:
mantlepiecek said:

It maybe scary, but it is probably the truth. He is probably not the first person to have thought nintendo = kids, so really at least he was honest.

What he did in the end is a product that you would actually want, right? I cringe when some people are actually crediting nintendo for that - they just told him to not make it casualized, the guys who made it are still the same people you guys are hating.

Right. They stood up to third party crap. That's good.

Does the child who tried to stick a fork in the electrical socket get credit for being alive when it was the parent who had to stop him?

"They stood upto third party"

Seriously? Nintendo haven't worked 1% in this game, if it weren't for the stupid third party as you say it, you wouldn't have even got this game.

Oh and that comparison with the child is very very far off. It's like that analogy - I can't fly, turtles can't fly, I am a turtle.

edit : In your analogy, at least I can point out that the parents still can't claim the credit for surviving the electric socket, because they didn't. It was the child, really. At best they could try and gain some credit for saving him, if they weren't as reckless to begin with.