slowmo said:
The difference between Microsoft and Sony is that one company entered this generation with a sound business model and as largely had a successful strategy, while the other had a appalling business model that has bled the company dry of profits. PSN has also spent most of the gen as a inferior service to Live too might I add. Plus the small fact that due to better infrastructure and I'm sure more proactive maintenence of their servers, Microsoft have never had long term outages like Sony have had on more than one occasion. Perhaps because Microsoft invest the money they've taken in fees into better management of their network. At the end of the day if you hate it so much I have to question how you can judge the value in the service, it's clear you've not used it for a long time. You're in for a massive shock next gen when Sony start charging... |
Sony and Nintendo still makes third parties pay for servers (as they should). Microsoft couldn't win over the PC crowd because you can force people to pay for an online all in one hub option when the PC is pretty much just that to begin with and doesn't generalize itself to one option. This is why Xbox Live will never be open format and they will continue to have words with Gabe Newell who used to question Sony and now after working with Sony has seen Microsoft needs to open up Xbox Live a little bit.







